ECB’s Lane say first rate hike is no big deal, cautious on further moves
2022.04.29 15:41
FILE PHOTO: A symphony of light consisting of bars, lines and circles in blue and yellow, the colours of the European Union, illuminates the south facade of the European Central Bank (ECB) headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, December 30, 2021. REUTERS/Wol
FRANKFURT (Reuters) -The European Central Bank’s first rate hike in over a decade is no big issue for the ECB and the question is rather how fast it should raise borrowing costs further after that, the bank’s chief economist Philip Lane said on Friday.
Inflation in the euro zone hit a fresh record on Friday and investors are expecting the ECB to ditch its policy of negative interest rates and massive bond purchases, which was adopted eight years ago to revive sluggish price growth.
Lane seemed to confirm expectations of an imminent increase to the ECB’s deposit rate, which investors expect in July, but he was cautious on further hikes, citing the war in Ukraine as a risk to the outlook.
“The story is not the issue about ‘are we going to move away from minus 0.5 (%) for the deposit rate’,” Lane said on Bloomberg TV.
“The big issue which we do have to still be data-dependent about is the scale and the timing of interest rate normalisation.”
The ECB has never said what it meant by normalisation but policymakers who spoke to Reuters said that equated to a policy rate of between 1% and 1.25%.
Investors are pricing in nearly 90 basis points of ECB hikes by the end of this year.
Data earlier on Friday showed euro zone inflation inched up to a new record high of 7.5% in April, driven by a persistent surge in energy and food prices.
But even with those volatile items filtered out, inflation still rose to 3.9%, or nearly twice the ECB’s 2% target, showing price pressures were rising in all corners of the economy.
“In the near-term, yes, inflation is very high and that does carry its own risk of momentum,” Lane said.
“On the other hand the high energy prices are eating into disposable incomes, it’s reducing consumption and the war has a scope – especially depending on how it goes – in terms of mapping into lower investment, lower consumption, confidence effects and extra pressure on energy.”
